My604 溫哥華生活資訊網


回覆
 
連回 主題工具
舊 11-14-2002   #1
mimishand
 
建構式數學

第一題:
49-13=?

40-10=30
9-3=6
30+6=36

共需三道計算式



第二題:
43-19=?

40-10=30
13-9=4
30-10=20
20+4=24

共需四道計算式


第三題:
493-199=?

共需n道計算式


第三題:
4003-1182=?

共需n*2道計算式



聰明的小孩子,若是用直式計算,從個位數計算起,只要教會他二位數計算方式,他就
能推到三位數、四位數.....

現在的小孩子,要計算三位數以上的加減法,須要算半天的時間,還會算錯!

~哈 ~哈 ~哈
~哈 ~哈 ~哈
~哈 ~哈 ~哈



題目: 2又3/4 除以 6

正常算法:
2又3/4 = 11/4
11/4 除以 6 = 11/24


建構式(賤狗式) 算法:
100 * 2又3/4 = 275
275 除以 6 = 45又5/6
45 除以 100 = 45/100
5/6 除以 100 = 5/600

45/100 + 5/600
=270/600 + 5/600
=275/600 (化簡後為11/24)

7道算式還得不到 11/24


大家不要笑!

我本來以為賤狗式數學是更快的計算方式,誰知道深入瞭解後就是這個樣子,連2位數
加減法都要寫3-6道計算式子,你們有讀小學的小朋友的話,千萬要自己教,不然這種
算法被定型時,他的計算能力會變的奇差無比。
mimishand is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-14-2002   #2
KCL
 
Blog Entries: 119
現在都計算機了 :shakehead

有些人連個位數都需要計算機呢

很可悲
KCL is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-14-2002   #3
-AJ-
 
Blog Entries: 167
+_+
-AJ- is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-14-2002   #4
CK
 
Blog Entries: 104
i saw that in the news.............

the person who invented and implemented this said.......

"math is about understanding, not about arithmetic"

made sense in some respect especially in post-secondary math..........

HOWEVER, arithmetic is the BASIC of math........most ppl can do simple arithmetic like 67-38 in matter of seconds. however, that new system will probably take minutes?! this system is ridiculing the human brain. :shakehead
CK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-14-2002   #5
-AJ-
 
Blog Entries: 167
put in one sentence...

people think too much

+_____+"
-AJ- is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-14-2002   #6
阿七
 
Blog Entries: 1
有好有壞吧...

看...老外也是那樣學...所以被我們笑...:biglaugh:

為了台灣的未來...還是別搞了吧!!!:shakehead
阿七 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-14-2002   #7
劍嶽
 
Blog Entries: 1

i have not think this method to find the ans ar
劍嶽 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-14-2002   #8
teppei
 
Blog Entries: 6
well... it's good to understand the math structure
computer uses binomial numbers to do its math... if our brain is fast enough to operate as a computer, I think that structural math method is good...

but we are not as stupid as a computer, we can do math for more than one digit, and we are not as stupid as a white man :biglaugh: so I like the old way~
teppei is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-14-2002   #9
Allen
 
Blog Entries: 11
一面學印度人練瑜伽一面學數學悟性會比較高吧~
Allen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
舊 11-15-2002   #10
阿苦
 
阿苦 的頭像
 
Blog Entries: 547
引用:
最初由 -AJ- 發表
put in one sentence...

people think too much

+_____+"
Haha~ good one :biglaugh:
阿苦 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
回覆時參照此文章
回覆


主題工具
顯示模式